You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In order to deploy safes in chains where the addresses are not the ones we get using the usual deterministic deployment, we need to manually input the factory and singleton addresses. For example:
Even though these addresses are different, they are deterministically different, we can therefore somehow signal to use the different address when needed depending on the chain
Feature
Provide the means to signal that contract addresses for chains supporting EIP-155 should be used instead of the regular ones obtained from deterministic deployments.
Proposal
Something along the lines of:
yarn safe create --l2 --eip155
Could be a way to implement this from a user's perspective.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Context
In order to deploy safes in chains where the addresses are not the ones we get using the usual deterministic deployment, we need to manually input the
factory
andsingleton
addresses. For example:yarn safe create --l2 --factory 0xC22834581EbC8527d974F8a1c97E1bEA4EF910BC --singleton 0xfb1bffC9d739B8D520DaF37dF666da4C687191EA
Even though these addresses are different, they are deterministically different, we can therefore somehow signal to use the different address when needed depending on the chain
Feature
Provide the means to signal that contract addresses for chains supporting
EIP-155
should be used instead of the regular ones obtained from deterministic deployments.Proposal
Something along the lines of:
yarn safe create --l2 --eip155
Could be a way to implement this from a user's perspective.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: