Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What is the difference of this repo between questions in slack? #1

Open
voborgus opened this issue Jan 20, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

What is the difference of this repo between questions in slack? #1

voborgus opened this issue Jan 20, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@voborgus
Copy link

The second point for communication can mislead people.

@MaineC
Copy link
Member

MaineC commented Mar 25, 2022

The intention was to post foundation related governance questions here and find solutions in public. Things like "should we switch to using only GitHub discussions and remove the Slack group" (no intention to do that now, but that would be one of the issues that in my opinion clearly belongs here.

However given the limited use this repo has seen, I believe it is time to archive it.

What do you think @InnerSourceCommons/members ?

@rrrutledge
Copy link
Contributor

Sure. Let people discuss things in the members channel.

@dellagustin-sap
Copy link

So, I see this seems to have become stale, but one point to be considered, discussions on GitHub are more transparent than Slack and also more traceable, as the non-paid version of Slack only allows us access to messages that are newer than 90 day, or something like that.
Even if we start paying for Slack, I would not rely on its messages for traceability, otherwise we will be locked into it.
Of course, we are also locked into GitHub, but it is free and I don't think that is likely to change.
Full disclosure, I work for SAP, Slack was bought by Salesforce, which is a competitor.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants