Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ip:8083/JS/Run/zway.devices shows wrong data for device #480

Open
pmbert opened this issue Jan 12, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

ip:8083/JS/Run/zway.devices shows wrong data for device #480

pmbert opened this issue Jan 12, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@pmbert
Copy link

pmbert commented Jan 12, 2019

ip:8083/JS/Run/zway.devices shows additional, not existing command class 132 for device 41, which is not a battery device.
Output of ip:8083/ZWaveAPI/Data/0 is correct.
(z-way version 2.3.7)

bildschirmfoto vom 2019-01-12 14-01-41
bildschirmfoto vom 2019-01-12 14-04-30

@PoltoS
Copy link
Member

PoltoS commented Jan 13, 2019

I suppose that CC have supported=false. This means the device sent a command with this CC to controller. It might be a Get command (device asks controller for battery level). But more likely it is a RF error that accidently matched the CRC and a CC was rendered as controller (supported=false)

@pmbert
Copy link
Author

pmbert commented Jan 13, 2019

You are right, command class 132 has supported=false.
Does this mean that I have to filter all those command classes?
Besides this I think that JS and ZWAY APi should work both in the same way.

@PoltoS
Copy link
Member

PoltoS commented Jan 14, 2019

JS API gives you a bit more info. This is historically. Agree, may be it is worth to unify them.

Yes, filter controlled only CCs if you don't need them

@pmbert
Copy link
Author

pmbert commented Jan 14, 2019

OK, a new interview removed the CC.
Don't know what a user can do with this information. Only to know, that an interview is recommended.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants