Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

User activity is using incorrect started reading date #3430

Open
masukomi opened this issue Sep 7, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

User activity is using incorrect started reading date #3430

masukomi opened this issue Sep 7, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@masukomi
Copy link

masukomi commented Sep 7, 2024

Describe the bug
In the user activity it says " started reading a minute ago" even if the started reading date i entered when i added the book was days ago. (see screenshot)
CleanShot 2024-09-07 at 10 20 27@2x

I suspect it's using the creation date for the record instead of the started reading date.

A clear and concise description of what the bug is.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. add a book to your "reading" list by clicking the widget under a books cover.

  2. change the started reading date to some day in the past.

  3. submit the form

  4. view the User Activity on your profile.

  5. Go to '...'

  6. Click on '....'

  7. Scroll down to '....'

  8. See error

Expected behavior
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.

Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

Instance
On which BookWyrm instance did you encounter this problem.

Bookwyrm.social

Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.


Desktop (please complete the following information):
- OS: macos
- Browser Waterfox (Firefox)
- Version G6.0.19

@masukomi masukomi added the bug Something isn't working label Sep 7, 2024
@masukomi
Copy link
Author

masukomi commented Sep 7, 2024

this seems to apply to the "finished reading" entry as well.

@hughrun
Copy link
Contributor

hughrun commented Sep 12, 2024

Ah. I can see why this is confusing.

The date in this case is referring to the publication date of the post, rather than the readthrough date. Might be worth reconsidering the way this is displayed. There's a connection here also to #3365

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants