Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-evaluate where we need to refer to Affiliates and Legal Entity #55

Open
silverhook opened this issue Oct 15, 2022 · 1 comment
Open
Labels
legal legal question

Comments

@silverhook
Copy link

In §1. Definitions we (in certain set-ups, but not FLA) have also the definition of Legal entity and its Affiliates, but is rarely ever used and not really consistently throughout.

For example:

  • it never shows up in the FLA
  • in non-FLA CLAs it shows up also in Individual CLA, where it is nowhere used in the document

In addition to that, it might make sense to see if there are other places where we should make use of it. A use case I have in mind is e.g. a corporation using the FLA or other CA.o CLA as a means to collaborate with another corporation (think B2B custom ordered functionality where it makes sense to also upstream that code).

@silverhook silverhook added the legal legal question label Oct 15, 2022
@silverhook
Copy link
Author

Affiliates are used only in the Patent Pledge option.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
legal legal question
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant