Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ability to toggle collapse of chats in any given connection #611

Closed
acagastya opened this issue Jul 5, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Ability to toggle collapse of chats in any given connection #611

acagastya opened this issue Jul 5, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@acagastya
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Consider the following image.
Screenshot 2021-07-04 at 08 40 06
I would not call it problem per se, but having many channels and chats in a connection could be too distracting.

Describe the solution you'd like
I would suggest having a ▶/▼ to toggle hide/show of the list (hidden by default) might be a good idea. Maybe an aggregate message count number like this screenshot would be a good idea? (First one is how it looks currently, second is the proposed solution.)
Screenshot 2021-07-05 at 02 41 28
Screenshot 2021-07-05 at 02 44 25

Describe alternatives you've considered
None.

Additional context
I think that should suffice.

@jhthorsen
Copy link
Collaborator

I don't think this is a good idea. I can't imagine a situation where I want to "constantly" toggle the whole list just to see what hides under that unread count.

I think there's other ways to do this better:

I'll leave the issue open for a while, but will probably close it unless some other compelling argument is made. It's not that I don't see the problem, it's just that I don't think your suggested solution is optimal.

@jhthorsen jhthorsen added this to the Backlog milestone Jul 5, 2021
@jhthorsen jhthorsen added the ux label Jul 5, 2021
@jhthorsen
Copy link
Collaborator

I think #609 would be a better solution, but I'm going to close this since I also closed #609.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants