Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

"Apache-2" should be reported as "Apache-2.0" #24

Open
sschuberth opened this issue Oct 5, 2015 · 1 comment
Open

"Apache-2" should be reported as "Apache-2.0" #24

sschuberth opened this issue Oct 5, 2015 · 1 comment

Comments

@sschuberth
Copy link

Ninka already reports "Apache-1.0", so using "Apache-2.0" would be more consistent, plus the latter would match the name SPDX identifier.
@sschuberth sschuberth changed the title "Apache-2" should be reproted as "Apache-2.0" "Apache-2" should be reported as "Apache-2.0" Jun 21, 2016
@silverhook
Copy link

silverhook commented Oct 7, 2016 •
edited
Loading

In general, adopting the SPDX identifiers for all licenses would make sense IMHO. I propose to extend this bug to any license identifiers in Ninka that currently aren’t SPDX-compatible.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@sschuberth @silverhook