Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

RFC7959 - blockwise PUT/POST - DTLS considerations #1855

Closed
boaks opened this issue Dec 15, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

RFC7959 - blockwise PUT/POST - DTLS considerations #1855

boaks opened this issue Dec 15, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@boaks
Copy link
Contributor

boaks commented Dec 15, 2021

Just in the case, someone wants to check the own specific handling of that cases, feel free to comment on the correlated corrclar - issue.

I plan to provide a first fix this year (3.1 or 3.2, and 2.6.8), but if the discussion takes longer, a second fix may be required as well.
@boaks
Copy link
Contributor Author

boaks commented Dec 16, 2021 •
edited
Loading

See PR #1857 (for 3.1)

@boaks
Copy link
Contributor Author

boaks commented Dec 17, 2021

See PR #1859 (for 2.7.)

@boaks
Copy link
Contributor Author

boaks commented Dec 21, 2021

For GET I considered, that on a mismatch, the request should be forwarded to the application layer. That enable the application layer to handle that as "random blockwise get" and not accidentally responds with data for other peers.

See PR #1864 and PR #1863

@boaks
Copy link
Contributor Author

boaks commented Dec 21, 2021

Will be fixed with 3.1.0 and 2.7.0

@boaks boaks closed this as completed Dec 21, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@boaks