Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to make sure the learned physics doesn’t contain the dynamical part during traing? #76

Open
weatherforecasterwhai opened this issue May 15, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@weatherforecasterwhai
Copy link

If in train, the learned part can not divide from dynamical part,in inference, adding them together will double count the mixed part?

@shoyer
Copy link
Collaborator

shoyer commented May 17, 2024

I'm not sure exactly what you're trying to do, but you will probably need to modify the code.

@weatherforecasterwhai
Copy link
Author

I just try to understand how could neuralGCM be much better than other pure data-driven models in my running case.
And how to make use of it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants