Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Contribution #131

Closed
adeolaibigbemi opened this issue Sep 14, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Contribution #131

adeolaibigbemi opened this issue Sep 14, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
Contribution If you want to contribute to the source code

Comments

@adeolaibigbemi
Copy link

I want to contribute to this project.
Kindly reach out to me.

@hosseinmoein
Copy link
Owner

Read #130 issue

@hosseinmoein hosseinmoein added the Contribution If you want to contribute to the source code label Sep 14, 2021
@hosseinmoein
Copy link
Owner

If you have noticed in most DataFrame member functions, the programmer must specify the column type(s). In some cases, this is not necessary. We could deduce the column type(s) from other parameters passed to the function. An example is the load_column() member function.

As the first contribution, why don't you change load_column() not to require column type and become a non-template member function. You can figure out the type of the column from the type of the data passed to it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Contribution If you want to contribute to the source code
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants