You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently EE ER DR are defined based on a desired isomer.
enum SelectivityType {
UNSPECIFIED = 0;
CUSTOM = 1;
EE = 2; // Enantiomeric excess as a percentage (desired - undesired).
ER = 3; // Enantiomeric ratio. (x:1) (desired / undesired).
DR = 4; // Diasteromeric ratio. (x:1) (desired / undesired).
EZ = 5; // Alkene geometry ratio. (x:1) (E / Z)
ZE = 6; // Alkene geometry ratio. (x:1) (Z / E)
}
It seems to me that this implies there are exactly two ProductCompound instances, and only one of them is desired. This could be ambiguous when there are other products for which the user has to look at the structures and decide which two of the products are enantiomers/diasteromers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently EE ER DR are defined based on a desired isomer.
It seems to me that this implies there are exactly two
ProductCompound
instances, and only one of them is desired. This could be ambiguous when there are other products for which the user has to look at the structures and decide which two of the products are enantiomers/diasteromers.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: