Question: would rav1d integration make sense?

[Quackdoc]

Rav1d being a port of dav1d to rust, is intended to be a drop in replacement for dav1d, and this extends to librav1d vs libdav1d. rav1d does not currently have a rust API and is focused on being a drop in dav1d replacement for now see memorysafety/rav1d#1252

I was wondering if a rav1d-sys would make sense as an optional toggle. Currently rav1d is a still slower then dav1d, but still fast enough to be used.

[lu-zero]

I'd wait till it is completely oxidized since as it is now we'd still need nasm and a C compiler, but it is definitely something to consider.

Sorry for not replying sooner!