Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure correct treatment of damage to spare ranks #35

Open
rfvander opened this issue May 3, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Ensure correct treatment of damage to spare ranks #35

rfvander opened this issue May 3, 2017 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@rfvander
Copy link
Contributor

rfvander commented May 3, 2017

Right now in the test programs we have, including the Fenix-fortified PRK, we observe what happens when an active rank kills itself. We don’t have a structured mechanism to introduce errors in spare ranks, and I am pretty sure we don’t fully cover that case now. I can show you with the PRKs as an example. Instead of issuing a sigkill from inside the code, I can start a long-running case in the background, fetch rank PIDs, and issue “kill -9 PID” from the console, shooting down active OR spare ranks. Results are not very consistent, although the code always finishes and passes the verification test

@rfvander rfvander added the bug label May 3, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant