Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BBU] Business Model #6: Rate slabs for subscribers #40

Open
aratibaliga opened this issue Mar 13, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

[BBU] Business Model #6: Rate slabs for subscribers #40

aratibaliga opened this issue Mar 13, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@aratibaliga
Copy link

Identify and state rate slabs for subscribers.

@aratibaliga aratibaliga changed the title [Business Model#6] - Rate slab for subscribers [Business Model#6] - Rate slabs for subscribers Mar 13, 2020
@vinomaster
Copy link
Contributor

Pls read termsheet where such proposed "slabs" are provided. Our website will of course need to publish the Subscription Plan offerings.

@vinomaster vinomaster changed the title [Business Model#6] - Rate slabs for subscribers [BBU] Business Model #6: Rate slabs for subscribers Mar 15, 2020
@vinomaster
Copy link
Contributor

We need to decide what the initial subscription plans will be.

Q1: Do we need subscription plans completed before launching?
Q2: Do we have TE that can handle such plans?

@ajeybelsare
Copy link

Previously there was a flat rate of $10 per write transactions, which I am inferring from the term sheet (1000 & 1500 write transactions for $10000/yr & for $15000/yr respectively).
Now it is mentioned 1000 & 1500 write transactions for $ TBD/yr.
So what factors do we need to take into consideration of pricing?
Can we have slabs such as
500 - 1000 write transactions for $X/yr
1000 - 1500 write transactions for $Y/yr
1500 - 2000 write transactions for $Z/yr, wherein we make it per transaction price cheaper as the number of transactions increase.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants