New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Look at using a different capability name for a modifiable key store #398

Open

darranl opened this issue Feb 4, 2017 · 0 comments

Milestone

Contributor

darranl commented Feb 4, 2017

We currently have a special interface which can return a modifiable variant.

Is this really necessary or could we just use a different capability name and where a resource type supports modifiable register as two capabilities.

darranl modified the milestones: 1.0.0.Beta5, 1.0.0.Beta6, 1.0.0.Beta7

darranl modified the milestones: 1.0.0.Beta7, 1.0.0.Beta8, 1.0.0.Beta9, 1.0.0.Beta10

darranl modified the milestones: 1.0.0.Beta10, 1.0.0.Beta11, 1.0.0.Beta12

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment