-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 902
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feature/#1858-add-s3-object-data-node #1868
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @AdeshGhadage, thank you for your contribution.
The PR has well-handled the __AWS_REGION
parameter.
And for the __AWS_S3_OBJECT_PARAMETERS
, it is more complex since we need a more generic solution, which requires updating the configuration as well.
Please take a look at my comment and let me know what you think.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good progress.
The next step would be:
- updating the configuration for the S3ObjectDataNode here
- updating the docstring for the
_configure_s3_object()
method with new parameters. - updating the docstring of the
S3ObjectDataNode
class. It should be very similar to the_configure_s3_object()
method.
@trgiangdo @jrobinAV Any other changes ? or some mistake I have made? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some final comments. Other than those, I think the PR is looking really good
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You also need to remove the _OPTIONAL_AWS_S3_OBJECT_PARAMETERS_PROPERTY
in line 263 of the data_node_config.py
file, and add the new OPTIONAL.. constant to the _STORAGE_TYPE_VALUE_S3_OBJECT
dict (as pointed out by the linter)
There are still some trailing spaces left in the code, as suggested by the linter here. Other than that, I believe the PR is good to go, when all tests pass |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @AdeshGhadage, thank you again for your contribution. The PR is ready to be merged.
However, due to the fact that Taipy is in the middle of a release, we will have to freeze all code changes for a few days.
In the meantime, feel free to take another issue to work on. We will merge this PR when the release is completed.
This pull request addresses issue #1858.
Hello Maintainers,
Could you please review my code? I would appreciate any suggestions or feedback you might have.
Thank you!