Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix(rf): Remove rf prefix from license fields in json #83

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 27, 2024
Merged

fix(rf): Remove rf prefix from license fields in json #83

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 27, 2024

Conversation

deo002
Copy link
Collaborator

@deo002 deo002 commented Sep 27, 2024

Changes

  • Remove rf prefix from license fields in json

Submitter Checklist

  • Includes tests (if there is a feature changed/added)
  • Includes docs ( if changes are user facing)
  • I have tested my changes locally.

References

image

@deo002 deo002 requested a review from GMishx September 27, 2024 08:07
GMishx
GMishx approved these changes Sep 27, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@GMishx GMishx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes looks good.

GMishx
GMishx approved these changes Sep 27, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@GMishx GMishx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested, working as expected.

@GMishx GMishx removed the needs test label Sep 27, 2024
@GMishx GMishx merged commit 4eee53c into fossology:main Sep 27, 2024
7 checks passed
@GMishx GMishx deleted the fix/remove_rf branch September 27, 2024 10:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@GMishx GMishx GMishx approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@deo002 @GMishx