Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

geozero-shp release with deprecation message #234

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 30, 2024

Conversation

pka
Copy link
Member

@pka pka commented Aug 28, 2024

Should be released & merged before #233

Copy link
Member

@michaelkirk michaelkirk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you include a module level declaration so that people can see it in their compiler output, since people often don't read documentation:

Something like:

#![deprecated(note = "The geozero_shp crate has been deprecated. Instead, use geozero's built-in shapefile feature")]

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
[package]
name = "geozero-shp"
version = "0.5.0"
Copy link
Member

@michaelkirk michaelkirk Aug 29, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
version = "0.5.0"
version = "0.5.1"

I think this should be a patch bump - we're not breaking anything right?

@pka
Copy link
Member Author

pka commented Aug 29, 2024

Test fails because of clippy complaints... Will force merge it when both PRs are ready.

@pka pka merged commit bbd401b into georust:main Aug 30, 2024
1 check failed
@pka pka deleted the geozero-shp-deprecation branch August 30, 2024 22:45
@pka
Copy link
Member Author

pka commented Aug 30, 2024

Note to self: Release to crates.io just after next geozero release!

@pka pka restored the geozero-shp-deprecation branch August 30, 2024 23:14
@michaelkirk
Copy link
Member

Will we have to pin to a specific (old) version of geozero for this geozero_shp release? Currently it's using "workspace"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants