Add text of LF proposal #203
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
krassowski
reviewed
Mar 5, 2024
| proven method to support the Jupyter Project.** | ||
|
|
||
| In order to manage this new resource (the Jupyter Foundation), we | ||
| propose to create a new committee (JFC), populated by representatives of |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Does JFC stand for Jupyter Funding Committee?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, this is what we meant here. The name is something that may change as things progress.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Here, you will find the details of a proposal the EC has recently written after months of background research and detailed conversations with teams from NumFOCUS, the Linux Foundation, and other entities in this space. We appreciate your patience while you waited for concrete output from us on this matter. It was important that we both do substantial due diligence and that we have a chance to wait for NumFOCUS to publicly communicate their own plans.
This proposal will be merged into the governance repo immediately because it is just that, a proposal. A formal PR, to be voted on by the EC and SSC, will follow after a period of gathering input from the community. We have opened an issue in the governance repo for community discussion based on this document. We encourage your input on this topic - we will both monitor the issue and hold open EC office hours (Thursdays, 10am Pacific, on zoom) for anyone who would like to talk synchronously about this topic.
Many thanks for your patience - we are excited about this plan and we hope to work with all of you to move forward!
Thanks,
Jupyter Executive Council