Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue3438 d xdehumidifier #3475

Open
wants to merge 95 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Issue3438 d xdehumidifier #3475

wants to merge 95 commits into from

Conversation

JayHuLBL
Copy link
Contributor

This closes #3438.

@karthikeyad-pnnl We are trying to merge the change to master. Would you please take another look to check if the changes are expected?

@JayHuLBL JayHuLBL self-assigned this Aug 18, 2023
@karthikeyad-pnnl
Copy link
Contributor

This closes #3438.

@karthikeyad-pnnl We are trying to merge the change to master. Would you please take another look to check if the changes are expected?

@terrancelu92: I had a quick look and everything seems to be in order. Can you please review the changes and let @JayHuLBL know if all the changes are expected? Thanks!

@JayHuLBL
Copy link
Contributor Author

@karthikeyad-pnnl @terrancelu92
We are seeing following warning:

12960000.000 DXDehumidifier.building: Warning from EnergyPlus: Version: in IDF="23.1" not the same as expected="9.6"
12960000.000 DXDehumidifier.building: Warning from EnergyPlus: Version: in IDF="23.1" not the same as expected="9.6"

Is it possible to downgrade the IDF file, to 9.6?

"Temperature sensor"
annotation (Placement(transformation(extent={{60,50},{80,70}})));

Modelica.Units.SI.MassFraction XOut
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we have to calcuate the XOut here? I also see that we have the sensor senMasFra and heaFloSen. Are they required by the model itself? I see that the values are not used anywhere else.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@JayHuLBL Thanks for catching this! I did another review of the code, and realized both XOut and senMasFra are not required. However, we are using heaFloSen to validate the heat transfer of the component within the validation model. It will be useful to identify any errors introduced in the calculation, via CI testing. Please refer to #3788. Thanks!

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
within Buildings.Fluid.Humidifiers.Data;
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be better if we could have a set of example data in the package. For example, see Buildings.Fluid.HeatPumps.Data.EquationFitReversible

Copy link
Contributor

@karthikeyad-pnnl karthikeyad-pnnl Apr 9, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@JayHuLBL We actually have an example in the Validation package (Humidifiers.Validation.Data). Should we move it to this package?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@JayHuLBL Is the data from the EnergyPlus reference?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. The parameter values came from the EPlus model that was used for the validation process

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add it to the Data package

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

DX dehumidifier component model
4 participants