Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

encourage expression of what interface the semantic versioning covers #540

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

encourage expression of what interface the semantic versioning covers #540

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
e187fa4
encourage expression of what interface the semantic versioning covers
altendky Mar 12, 2023
d997a24
add a semantic versioning faq entry
altendky Mar 12, 2023
bc3e7fb
correct href
altendky Mar 12, 2023
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
331 changes: 331 additions & 0 deletions source/en/1.2.0/index.html.haml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,331 @@
---
description: Keep a Changelog
title: Keep a Changelog
language: en
version: 1.2.0
---
.header
.title
%h1 Keep a Changelog
%h2 Don’t let your friends dump git logs into changelogs.

= link_to data.links.changelog do
Version
%strong= current_page.metadata[:page][:version]

%pre.changelog{ lang: "en" }= File.read("CHANGELOG.md")

.answers
%h3#what
%a.anchor{ href: "#what", aria_hidden: "true" }
What is a changelog?

%p
A changelog is a file which contains a curated, chronologically
ordered list of notable changes for each version of a project.

%h3#why
%a.anchor{ href: "#why", aria_hidden: "true" }
Why keep a changelog?

%p
To make it easier for users and contributors to see precisely what
notable changes have been made between each release (or version) of
the project.

%h3#who
%a.anchor{ href: "#who", aria_hidden: "true" }
Who needs a changelog?

%p
People do. Whether consumers or developers, the end users of
software are human beings who care about what's in the software. When
the software changes, people want to know why and how.

.good-practices
%h3#how
%a.anchor{ href: "#how", aria_hidden: "true" }
How do I make a good changelog?

%h4#principles
%a.anchor{ href: "#principles", aria_hidden: "true" }
Guiding Principles

%ul
%li
Changelogs are <em>for humans</em>, not machines.
%li
There should be an entry for every single version.
%li
The same types of changes should be grouped.
%li
Versions and sections should be linkable.
%li
The latest version comes first.
%li
The release date of each version is displayed.
%li
Mention whether you follow #{link_to "Semantic Versioning", data.links.semver} and what interfaces it covers.

%a.anchor{ href: "#types", aria_hidden: "true" }
%h4#types Types of changes

%ul
%li
%code Added
for new features.
%li
%code Changed
for changes in existing functionality.
%li
%code Deprecated
for soon-to-be removed features.
%li
%code Removed
for now removed features.
%li
%code Fixed
for any bug fixes.
%li
%code Security
in case of vulnerabilities.

.effort

%h3#effort
%a.anchor{ href: "#effort", aria_hidden: "true" }
How can I reduce the effort required to maintain a changelog?

%p
Keep an <code>Unreleased</code> section at the top to track upcoming
changes.

%p This serves two purposes:

%ul
%li
People can see what changes they might expect in upcoming releases
%li
At release time, you can move the <code>Unreleased</code> section
changes into a new release version section.

.bad-practices
%h3#bad-practices
%a.anchor{ href: "#bad-practices", aria_hidden: "true" }
Can changelogs be bad?

%p Yes. Here are a few ways they can be less than useful.

%h4#log-diffs
%a.anchor{ href: "#log-diffs", aria_hidden: "true" }
Commit log diffs

%p
Using commit log diffs as changelogs is a bad idea: they're full of
noise. Things like merge commits, commits with obscure titles,
documentation changes, etc.

%p
The purpose of a commit is to document a step in the evolution of
the source code. Some projects clean up commits, some don't.

%p
The purpose of a changelog entry is to document the noteworthy
difference, often across multiple commits, to communicate them
clearly to end users.

%h4#ignoring-deprecations
%a.anchor{ href: "#ignoring-deprecations", aria_hidden: "true" }
Ignoring Deprecations

%p
When people upgrade from one version to another, it should be
painfully clear when something will break. It should be possible to
upgrade to a version that lists deprecations, remove what's
deprecated, then upgrade to the version where the deprecations
become removals.

%p
If you do nothing else, list deprecations, removals, and any
breaking changes in your changelog.


%h4#confusing-dates
%a.anchor{ href: "#confusing-dates", aria_hidden: "true" }
Confusing Dates

%p
Regional date formats vary throughout the world and it's often
difficult to find a human-friendly date format that feels intuitive
to everyone. The advantage of dates formatted like
<code>2017-07-17</code> is that they follow the order of largest to
smallest units: year, month, and day. This format also doesn't
overlap in ambiguous ways with other date formats, unlike some
regional formats that switch the position of month and day numbers.
These reasons, and the fact this date format is an
#{link_to "ISO standard", data.links.isodate}, are why it is the recommended date
format for changelog entries.

%h4#inconsistent-changes
%a.anchor{ href: "#inconsistent-changes", aria_hidden: "true" }
Inconsistent Changes

%p
A changelog which only mentions some of the changes can be as dangerous
as not having a changelog. While many of the changes may not be
relevant - for instance, removing a single whitespace may not need
to be recorded in all instances - any important changes should be
mentioned in the changelog. By inconsistently applying changes,
your users may mistakenly think that the changelog is the single source
of truth. It ought to be. With great power comes great responsibility -
having a good changelog means having a consistently updated changelog.

%aside
There’s more. Help me collect these antipatterns by
= link_to "opening an issue", data.links.issue
or a pull request.

.frequently-asked-questions
%h3#frequently-asked-questions
%a.anchor{ href: "#frequently-asked-questions", aria_hidden: "true" }
Frequently Asked Questions

%h4#standard
%a.anchor{ href: "#standard", aria_hidden: "true" }
Is there a standard changelog format?

%p
Not really. There's the #{link_to "GNU changelog style guide", data.links.gnustyle},
or the #{link_to "two-paragraph-long GNU NEWS file", data.links.gnunews}
"guideline". Both are inadequate or insufficient.

%p
This project aims to be
= link_to "a better changelog convention.", data.links.changelog
It comes from observing good practices in the open source
community and gathering them.

%p
Healthy criticism, discussion and suggestions for improvements
= link_to "are welcome.", data.links.issue


%h4#filename
%a.anchor{ href: "#filename", aria_hidden: "true" }
What should the changelog file be named?

%p
Call it <code>CHANGELOG.md</code>. Some projects use
<code>HISTORY</code>, <code>NEWS</code> or <code>RELEASES</code>.

%p
While it's easy to think that the name of your changelog file
doesn't matter that much, why make it harder for your end users to
consistently find notable changes?

%h4#github-releases
%a.anchor{ href: "#github-releases", aria_hidden: "true" }
What about GitHub Releases?

%p
It's a great initiative. #{link_to "Releases", data.links.github_releases} can be used to
turn simple git tags (for example a tag named <code>v1.0.0</code>)
into rich release notes by manually adding release notes or it can
pull annotated git tag messages and turn them into notes.

%p
GitHub Releases create a non-portable changelog that can only be
displayed to users within the context of GitHub. It's possible to
make them look very much like the Keep a Changelog format, but it
tends to be a bit more involved.

%p
The current version of GitHub releases is also arguably not very
discoverable by end-users, unlike the typical uppercase files
(<code>README</code>, <code>CONTRIBUTING</code>, etc.). Another
minor issue is that the interface doesn't currently offer links to
commit logs between each release.

%h4#automatic
%a.anchor{ href: "#automatic", aria_hidden: "true" }
Can changelogs be automatically parsed?

%p
It’s difficult, because people follow wildly different formats and
file names.

%p
#{link_to "Vandamme", data.links.vandamme} is a Ruby gem created by the
Gemnasium team and which parses many (but
not all) open source project changelogs.


%h4#semver
%a.anchor{ href: "#semver", aria_hidden: "true" }
What should be said about Semantic Versioning coverage?

%p
It is valuable to document both what parts of the project are following
the rules of #{link_to "Semantic Versioning", data.links.semver}, as
well as what parts are not. A project may provide programming language
native APIs, CLIs, RPCs, network protocols, file formats, or even have
compatibility concerns around the data transferred through any of those.

%p
Making this clear to users of a project helps them understand how to
interpret the versions of the project and the sections of the changelog.

%h4#yanked
%a.anchor{ href: "#yanked", aria_hidden: "true" }
What about yanked releases?

%p
Yanked releases are versions that had to be pulled because of a
serious bug or security issue. Often these versions don't even
appear in change logs. They should. This is how you should display
them:

%p <code>## [0.0.5] - 2014-12-13 [YANKED]</code>

%p
The <code>[YANKED]</code> tag is loud for a reason. It's important
for people to notice it. Since it's surrounded by brackets it's also
easier to parse programmatically.


%h4#rewrite
%a.anchor{ href: "#rewrite", aria_hidden: "true" }
Should you ever rewrite a changelog?

%p
Sure. There are always good reasons to improve a changelog. I
regularly open pull requests to add missing releases to open source
projects with unmaintained changelogs.

%p
It's also possible you may discover that you forgot to address a
breaking change in the notes for a version. It's obviously important
for you to update your changelog in this case.


%h4#contribute
%a.anchor{ href: "#contribute", aria_hidden: "true" }
How can I contribute?

%p
This document is not the <strong>truth</strong>; it’s my carefully
considered opinion, along with information and examples I gathered.

%p
This is because I want our community to reach a consensus. I believe
the discussion is as important as the end result.

%p
So please <strong>#{link_to "pitch in", data.links.repo}</strong>.

.press
%h3 Conversations
%p
I went on #{link_to "The Changelog podcast", data.links.thechangelog}
to talk about why maintainers and contributors should care about changelogs,
and also about the motivations behind this project.