Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: added fuzzing output enhancements #5126

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 3, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Ice3man543
Copy link
Member

Proposed changes

Closes #4908 by implementing extra output for fuzzing results. Deduplication is a separate issue #4962

Screenshot 2024-05-01 at 2 06 07 AM

Checklist

  • Pull request is created against the dev branch
  • All checks passed (lint, unit/integration/regression tests etc.) with my changes
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate)

@Ice3man543 Ice3man543 self-assigned this Apr 30, 2024
Copy link
Member

@ehsandeep ehsandeep left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in multiple mode where we don't know which query parameter got matched, we print blank query result, which we can ignore from CLI output.

[generic-rfi] [http] [high] https://example.com/?x=https://rfi.nessus.org/rfi.txt&f=https://rfi.nessus.org/rfi.txt [query:] [GET]

@ehsandeep ehsandeep merged commit 9784ca8 into dev May 3, 2024
9 of 12 checks passed
@ehsandeep ehsandeep deleted the fuzzing-output-enhancements branch May 3, 2024 13:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Feature request [Add more clarity to the result and remove duplicates]
4 participants