Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fixing path longer on approach #4622

Merged

Conversation

padhupradheep
Copy link
Member


Basic Info

Info Please fill out this column
Ticket(s) this addresses #4110
Primary OS tested on (Ubuntu)
Robotic platform tested on ROX
Does this PR contain AI generated software? No

Description of contribution in a few bullet points

Description of documentation updates required from your changes


Future work that may be required in bullet points

For Maintainers:

  • Check that any new parameters added are updated in docs.nav2.org
  • Check that any significant change is added to the migration guide
  • Check that any new features OR changes to existing behaviors are reflected in the tuning guide
  • Check that any new functions have Doxygen added
  • Check that any new features have test coverage
  • Check that any new plugins is added to the plugins page
  • If BT Node, Additionally: add to BT's XML index of nodes for groot, BT package's readme table, and BT library lists

@padhupradheep
Copy link
Member Author

almost done!! I want to test it once again in fresh eyes before getting this in.

Sorry, it got longer than expected.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Files Coverage Δ
...tree/plugins/decorator/path_longer_on_approach.cpp 91.66% <100.00%> (+0.23%) ⬆️

... and 5 files with indirect coverage changes

@SteveMacenski
Copy link
Member

SteveMacenski commented Aug 19, 2024

I know how that goes sometimes 😉 Thanks for getting to it!

@SteveMacenski SteveMacenski linked an issue Aug 19, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@SteveMacenski
Copy link
Member

@padhupradheep if you're back (and if not, ignore this until you're back) can we address this last detail so we can button this up and move the PR out of draft so we can merge it?

@padhupradheep
Copy link
Member Author

I'm back! Will finish it EoD

@padhupradheep padhupradheep marked this pull request as ready for review September 11, 2024 16:51
@padhupradheep
Copy link
Member Author

Gtg now

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 11, 2024

@padhupradheep, your PR has failed to build. Please check CI outputs and resolve issues.
You may need to rebase or pull in main due to API changes (or your contribution genuinely fails).

@SteveMacenski
Copy link
Member

@padhupradheep this PR needs to be rebased to build - there was a rolling API change

@SteveMacenski SteveMacenski merged commit de4fd78 into ros-navigation:main Sep 15, 2024
9 of 10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[for help] BT node Is_path_longer_on_approach doesn't work
2 participants