Refactor: Remove redundant error check in task executor in executors.go #6564
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Edofo
approved these changes
Sep 26, 2024
|
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed?
This error check was redundant as it was already handled prior to the block, improving readability and maintaining clean, efficient error handling.
Why?
This error check was redundant as it was already handled prior to the block, improving readability and maintaining clean, efficient error handling.
How did you test it?
Tested locally with existing unit tests to ensure the task executor continues functioning as expected without introducing new errors.
Potential risks
There is a minimal risk of breaking error handling logic in taskExecutor, though the changes are straightforward and should have no functional impact.
Documentation
No updates required in documentation, as this is an internal refactor that does not affect behavior or interfaces.
Is hotfix candidate?
No, this is not a hotfix candidate.