Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(Sonar) Fixed finding: "@Override should be used on overriding and implementing methods" #305

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pixeeai
Copy link

@pixeeai pixeeai commented Jun 11, 2024

Remediation

This change fixes "@Override should be used on overriding and implementing methods" (id = java:S1161) identified by Sonar.

Details

This change adds missing @Override to known subclasses. Documenting inheritance will help readers and static analysis tools understand the code better, spot bugs easier, and in general lead to more efficient and effective review.

Our changes look something like this:

  interface AcmeParent {
     void doThing();
  } 

  class AcmeChild implements AcmeParent {

+   @Override
    void doThing() {
      thing();
    }
    
  }
More reading
🧚🤖 Powered by Pixeebot

Feedback | Community | Docs | Codemod ID: sonar:java/add-missing-override-s1161

pixeebot bot and others added 3 commits June 8, 2024 20:29
@pixeeai
Copy link
Author

pixeeai commented Jun 11, 2024

This change was autogenerated from a GitHub app - called Pixeebot. A code-quality GitHub App; like Dependabot, but for source code. Feel free to check it our for more details for how you can install it onto your project's repo for continued code hardening and code security recommendations. 👍

@manuelleduc
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is very limited, an accurate PR would fix all the missing override annotations at once.

@vmassol
Copy link
Member

vmassol commented Jun 11, 2024

@manuelleduc sure but we should still apply it IMO as it looks good

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants