-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
drivers: spi: RPi Pico PIO SPI code size and byte order. #74117
Open
ThreeEights
wants to merge
1
commit into
zephyrproject-rtos:main
Choose a base branch
from
ThreeEights:spi-rpi-pico-pio-endian
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+116
−128
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking at other drivers it seems that waiting on a bit without sleeping between iterations is legitimate. If any higher priority task needs to run it will get its runtime.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm sorry, but I'm not following you. Are you suggesting using a timer instead of k_sleep()? Or perhaps I didn't explain the problem clearly: Even after the last word has been shifted from the FIFO, clocked out by the PIO program, and the PIO program counter has returned to the starting point, a delay is still needed to allow the SPI bus signals to complete before the CPU can reset the PIO state machine to start the receive cycle. I can't think of any way for the CPU to detect the state of the SPI bus, which is why I added the delay here.
I did try to minimize the needed delay, though perhaps waiting the full word size is excessive. I'll test this with just one SPI clock cycle and see if that's enough.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Only one SPI bit time is needed; I tested it at both the fast end and the slow end of the BME280 clock range. (The issue is more of a problem at slow SPI clock rates.)